Paddling Alone

A bird watching club got me into my first kayak seven years ago. Someone, a member, had posted a Meetup promising an over-the-water tour of bird habitats on the local lake named for Ladybird Johnson, a woman who loved wild places enough to help protect them. Neon-colored kayaks often skimmed across that lake, the V’s they cut on the surface reminding me of the figures children and artists often drew to represent birds in flight. So I went, lured by the gravity-defying possibilities that water might hold.

I donned a life vest, butt-flopped from the dock into a kayak and buried an enthusiastic paddle into the water. I did not yet know to hold my elbow at a 45-degree angle. Or that dipping rather than digging my paddle would get me where I wanted to go faster and also keep me drier. Swimmer’s muscle memory made me pull my arms hard against the lake and scoop water straight into my kayak. Following the other birdwatchers—mostly women and a few men—I craned my neck to watch geese, ducks swans and the grackles I mistook for crows. But it was a lone silver egret that stole the show and my attention. Rapt at the sight of the egret beating its wings over the lake as it moved from tree to tree, I forgot the wetness that pooled at the bottom of my boat and soaked my clothes to the skin.

Of course I returned again not long after that first time, undeterred, this time without my gaggle of birdwatchers. They’d decided to meet on land and I wanted to be on the lake again because I’d fallen in love with kayaking and wanted to learn to enjoy the surface of water, the way it interacted with other spaces. The swimmer in me already understood the underside well. It was a space that demanded focus and a willingness to let go of smell and every sound except that of your own breathing. The surface was a different matter, a space where all senses could engage.

I rented another one-person kayak. The time before, I’d had the choice to take a double but declined. A single would let me stay with the group and follow or break off, as I knew my contrarian spirit would demand. Seeing birds, learning their names and learning to distinguish which cry or call belonged to which bird—all that had its pleasures. But what I really wanted was to test my own wings, finesse my strokes and turns, paddle upstream and glide under the bridges and in and out of the small green coves along the shore. And that meant a level of physical engagement with the water I could not have following binocular-eyed birdwatchers. For all their inexperience with kayaks, still managed to stay drier than I did by allowing the current push them along.

Paddling more deliberately and taking in less water into my boat, I passed a Southern gothic tangle of cedar elms sycamores and cypress, catching sight of nests that belonged to birds. Under bridges and on them, colorful graffiti—like the blind yellow Pac-Man on the Lamar Boulevard Bridge that vowed to Never Give Up—reminded me of other forms of wildlife. The hairless, mammalian kind that build as relentlessly as beavers, but didn’t always live in harmony with nature. These other animals that looked like me—they were more numerous than birds. And try as I might, I could not avoid them. As the temperatures rose, they sought the water, too. Some paddled in tandem with varying degrees of finesse. Others paddled past me alone or with canine companions in life jackets, front paws perched on the bow, noses tipped to the wind, reveling in scents no human could detect.

This time, I watched the tandem kayakers with particular interest. Men paired with men and women with women; but it was the male/female pairs I watched most closely, especially the ones where the men steered and the women sat behind. Some moved along well, if slowly; others not so much. I wondered if those couples, especially the more obviously inexperienced ones that relied on the current more than their paddles to push them along, knew that brawn didn’t matter here. What did was skill level, with the more experienced kayaker in front and the less experienced one in back. I wondered, too, how these pairs—any of them—could stand sitting between the someone’s splayed legs or having someone sit between their own. Kayaks are compact spaces; and while some might take comfort in contact, to me it would feel like too much constraint.

In a single kayak and despite the relative immobility of my legs, I could still push the boat as fast as the muscles in my core, shoulders and arms would allow. And that my less-freighted kayak would always move more quickly than tandems. I could go where I wanted when I wanted, without seeking permission or consensus. And I could own every last act and decision, for better or worse, like going too far up or down the river and getting fined for not returning to the dock on time. Or forgetting sunscreen. Or water to drink. And if I invited the lake into my kayak from sloppy strokes, I could still enjoy the cool wetness on my skin and through my clothes like the blessing it ultimately was.

I don’t know that I’ll ever try tandem kayaking. There’s pleasure—or comfort or security or all three—being among others. Ducks know this. So do geese and swans, who rarely swim the lake alone. So did my father, another bird I could neither catch nor keep, who desired the company of others but also paddled his own way. He’d tell me, the child too much like him, that I would end up alone if I didn’t learn to compromise. Of course, he rarely did and didn’t have to because he was a man; and I’d laugh at the irony he did not see, knowing he was probably right. But knowing, too, it was my choice.

And so I’ll keep paddling my kayak built for one because I prefer it like the silver egret prefers its solitude. An airy thing, it sometimes drags the big yellow feet at the end of its backward-bending legs in the water. The birdwatchers told me it does this to stir up the water and attract the fish it will eat, but I imagine more: that somehow, some way, those crazy feet keep the egret connected to what also feeds its soul.

Flowers for a Requiem

Cherry blossoms are sacred to the Japanese, who call them sakura. Pink, white, yellow and sometimes green, the flowers symbolize a natural world that is pure divinity; and in their fleeting softness, the way of all living things. Like the sakura that bloom for no more than two weeks every spring, life is briefly beautiful.

They’ve long since come and gone this year. They need cool winters to flower in March and April so they’re not a common sight in Texas. If they come to mind now, in the baking heat of a Central Plains summer, it’s because someone I knew, someone who used to be a friend, passed away less than a month before the first sakura bloomed in his adopted city of Tokyo.

Had he lived, he might have told people on Facebook about going on a hanami or cherry blossom viewing. I wouldn’t have seen that post though, or any other. Four years earlier, I’d severed every connection that had kept us tied together.

Our last contact had been by phone in 2018. I wasn’t in good place then and neither was he so I stepped away for a while. Then that while, which felt like the greatest relief, solidified into permanence. Meanness had become his habit as helplessness had become mine and the friendship had become this badly broken thing neither of us knew how to fix. He and I had known each other so long we couldn’t imagine our lives without each other. Unless I let go we’d continue to circle the drain like the bitter wedlocked couple we weren’t.

Things got better for me after that but slowly. Hand over hand, I pulled myself up and out of the hard place that nearly consumed me. But my former friend continued the slip-slide down. Two years after I cut the cord, a mutual acquaintance asked if I could put money into a fund she’d created to help him pay for cardiac surgery. He was a different man now, with a new heart powered by a pacemaker. I donated, glad to help. But the other thing she tacitly asked for—that I talk to him again—I could not do. He stopped trying to get me back into his life afterward.

I only learned about his death on social media. The mutual friend who’d advocated for his heart fund had not told me; at the time he died, she was too stunned to say anything to anyone beyond immediate friends and family. But thoughts of his passing stayed with me for days that turned into weeks then months. There was grief there, for an aborted friendship I believed I’d take with me to the end. But there was something else there, too, another sadness I’d not known before. In my youth I had not understand death or its finality; only that dying was something people— mostly the old—occasionally did. His death was different. With no ifs, ands or buts, his end swept away an invisible generational shield. Others would follow him because now death was not a matter of if but when.

He did not leave this world as my friend; but he is still the first among my contemporaries to pass into history. Which is significant not just because I will miss him, no matter the differences we had. But because he was there to witness moments with me that in their singularity, would not repeat again. Like turning twenty-one. Like leaving my college life for the great unknown. Like seeing the heart I’d held back from love shatter into more pieces than I could count. Then time passed and he himself became another kind of first: the one person to remain in my orbit for longer than a few months or years.

This man, this former friend, was a Berkeley drop-out who still ghosted campus the year I met him. His acquaintances were people I lived with at the student co-op. Stubbornly persistent, he called me, made me laugh and wheedled me for greater closeness so many times that the wheedling itself became a joke. Give it up, man, you’re crazy. It wasn’t funny though, at least not to him. I listened to him in a way few did, including the ex-Air Force father who bullied and beat him and the mother who let it happen because that’s what fathers did to sons. So he held on to the hope. And when, many years later, he came into his parents’ money—not much but a good sum—he offered what I, a broke adjunct professor, could never repay: a two-week trip east to enjoy the pleasures of a Manhattan Christmas.

He scoffed at my protests for almost a year before I finally consented to go with him, not thinking for a moment that our vacation was anything more than just a friendly excursion. Until he proved me wrong. Two nights before we left New York, he told me the strange truth: that he had intended the visit to be “the world’s longest date.” I said no again to a relationship; looking at me like an angry child, he demanded to know why. I explained what I thought he already knew. He was my friend for life, nothing more, nothing less. Though outwardly conciliatory, inwardly I fumed at his deception. The last time we had ever talked about his wish for a relationship had been more than twenty years before.

Nothing was the same after that. He became more irascible than ever. There was more I did that displeased than pleased and felt eggshells under my feet though I said nothing. Then my life went into upheaval and I turned to him. No matter what, he was still my friend…until the passive-aggressive rages became brutal enough I finally had to walk away. He became desperate after that, using every channel he could to reconnect. But I was done. Enough so that when my website tracker logged a visit from Japan just ten days before he passed away, a visit I knew was his, this ex-friend I had once loved like family felt like a stranger from another life.

He died of a disease that claims the aged and infirm, a middle-aged man who had reached the last season of his life. Now he is a signpost that tells me I am approaching the autumn of my days in a body that, though I no longer take this for granted, will likely grow older than his. These things I know and for these things I grieve. Yet I accept them like the lessons of the sakura: all things in their season, even friendships unable to withstand the inexorable test of human time.